Refine
Document type
- Conference Proceeding (20)
- Article (peer-reviewed) (6)
- Contribution to a Periodical (6)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Report (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- Yes (35) (remove)
Keywords
- Sustainability (7)
- Software engineering (6)
- Requirements engineering (5)
- Sustainable development (5)
- Software systems (3)
- SusAF (3)
- BPM body of knowledge (2)
- Business process management (2)
- Economics (2)
- Research discourses (2)
Digital transformation is now reaching into topics like End-of-life Care, Funeral Culture, and Coping with Grief. Those developments are inevitably accompanied by the growing challenge to design IT systems that are appropriate and helpful for the stakeholders involved. Our aim in this paper is to further introduce the rather new combined research field of Socioinformatics and Thanatology (the scientific study of death and dying) and to present it with the first results on which requirements to consider for the design of digital tools within ‘Thanatopractice’. By using Participatory Design and the Sustainability Awareness Framework (SusAF) in the context of three workshops on socio-technical systems (Online Pastoral Care, Virtual Graveyards, and AI Memory Avatars), we want to sensitize software practitioners to the multidimensional impacts of their products and services in a field, which the participants in the workshops often described as “highly sensitive”.
For many practitioners, considering sustainability during a software development project is a challenge. The Sustainability Awareness Framework (SusAF) is a tool for thinking through short, medium-and long-term impacts of socio-technical systems on its surrounding environment. While SusAF has been used by several companies, is not widely adopted in industry yet. In this Vision Paper, we discuss the options for extending the reach of SusAF and what it would take to evolve SusAF into a (de-facto) standard
Umsetzung eines Pay-as-you-Live Systems : Konzeptioneller Ansatz für ein eigenständiges PAYL-System
(2021)
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations focus on key issues for the transformation of our world towards sustainability. We argue for stronger integration of the SDGs into requirements and software engineering and for the creation of methods and tools that support the analysis of potential effects of software systems on sustainability in general and on SDGs in particular. To demonstrate one way of undertaking this integration, we report on how the Sustainability Awareness Framework (SusAF -- a tool developed by the authors of this paper) can be mapped to the SDGs, allowing the identification of potential effects of software systems on sustainability and on the SDGs. This mapping exercise demonstrates that it is possible for requirements engineers working on a specific system to consider that system's impact with respect to SDGs.
Software engineering, as a central practice of digitalization, needs to become accountable for sustainability. In light of the ecological crises and the tremendous impact of digital systems on reshaping economic and social arrangements - often with negative side-effects - we need a sustainability transformation of the digital transformation. However, this is a complex and long-term task. In this article we combine an analysis of accountability arrangements in software engineering and a model of sustainability transformations to trace how certain dynamics are starting to make software engineering accountable for sustainability in the technological, cultural, economic and governance domains. The article discusses existing approaches for sustainable software engineering and software engineering for sustainability, traces emerging discourses that connect digitalization and sustainability, highlights new digital business models that may support sustainability and shows governance efforts to highlight “green and digital” policy problems. Yet, we argue that these are so far niche dynamics and that a sustainability transformation requires a collective and long-lasting effort to engender systemic changes. The goal should be to create varied accountability arrangements for sustainability in software engineering which is embedded in complex ways in society and economy.
The Elephant in the Room - Educating Practitioners on Software Development for Sustainability
(2021)
Year after year, software engineers celebrate new achievements in the field of AI. At the same time, the question about the impacts of AI on society remains insufficiently answered in terms of a comprehensive technology assessment. This article aims to provide software practitioners with a theoretically grounded and practically tested approach that enables an initial understanding of the potential multidimensional impacts. Subsequently, the results form the basis for discussions on AI software requirements. The approach is based on the Sustainability Awareness Framework (SusAF) and Participatory Design. We conducted three workshops on different AI topics: 1. Autonomous Driving, 2. Music Composition, and 3. Memory Avatars. Based on the results of the workshops we conclude that a two-level approach should be adopted: First, a broad one that includes a diverse selection of stakeholders and overall impact analysis. Then, in a second step, specific approaches narrowing down the stakeholders and focusing on one or few impact areas.
Nachhaltigkeit ist für die Gesellschaften unseres Planeten von grundlegender Bedeutung, ebenso wie Software Systeme immer mehr Teil der heutigen Gesellschaften werden. Daher gewinnt Nachhaltigkeit auch immer mehr an Relevanz im Software Engineering und es wurden erste Ansätze entwickelt, um Nachhaltigkeit bei dem Software System Design zu berücksichtigen. Dennoch bleibt es schwer die erst später eintreffenden Auswirkungen von Entscheidungen, die beim System Design getroffen werden, zu erkennen und zu bewerten. Um diese schwierige Aufgabe zu unterstützen, wird in der Keynote die Metapher „Sustainability Debt“ vorgestellt. Die Metapher hilft bei der Identifikation, Dokumentation und Kommunikation von Nachhaltigkeitsfragen im Software Engineering. Sie baut auf der bestehenden Metapher des „Technical Debt“ auf und erweitert diese um vier weitere Dimensionen der Nachhaltigkeit (individuell, sozial, ökologisch, ökonomisch). Neben der Bedeutung der Metapher Sustainability Debt und ihrer Verwendung im Software Engineering wird im Rahmen der Keynote auch darauf eingegangen wie im Software Engineering Entscheidungen getroffen werden. Da Entscheidungen im Rahmen des Sustainability Debts immer bedeuten einen Kompromiss zu schließen zwischen zeitnahen und entfernten Ergebnissen. Bei solchen intertemporalen Entscheidungen werden entfernte Ergebnisse oft als weniger bedeutsam bewertet als zeitnahe, was berücksichtigt werden muss, um eine entsprechende Entscheidungsunterstützung zur Verringerung des Sustainability Debts zu liefern.
Context: The Software Engineering process can be seen as a socio-technical activity that involves fulfilling one's role as part of a team. Accordingly, software products and services are the result of a specific collaboration between employees (and other stakeholders). In recent years, sustainability, which Requirements Engineers often paraphrase as the ability of a system to endure, is becoming part of the process and thus the responsibility of Software Engineers (SE) as well. Objectives: This study shines the spotlight on the role of the SE: their self-attribution and their awareness for sustainability. We interviewed 13 SEs to figure out how they perceive their own role and to which extent they implement the topic of sustainability in their daily work. By visualizing these two sides, it is possible to debate changes and their possible paths to benefit the Software Engineering process including sustainability design. Results: A discrepancy between the current role and the ideal role of SEs becomes visible. It is characterized in particular by dwelling on their “classic” or time-honored tasks as an executive force, such as coding. At the same time, they point out the still missing necessity of an interdisciplinary, from communication coined working method. According to our interviewees SEs are inefficiently involved in the design process. They do not sufficiently assume their responsibility for the software and its sustainability impacts.