Refine
Document type
- Conference Proceeding (26)
- Article (peer-reviewed) (7)
- Contribution to a Periodical (6)
- Report (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Keywords
- Sustainability (8)
- Software engineering (6)
- Requirements engineering (5)
- Sustainable development (5)
- Business process management (3)
- Software systems (3)
- SusAF (3)
- BPM body of knowledge (2)
- Decision making (2)
- Economics (2)
It is a fundamental right of every natural person to control which personal information is collected, stored and processed by whom, for what purposes and how long. In fact, many (cloud based) services can only be used if the user allows them broad data collection and analysis. Often, users can only decide to either give their data or not to participate in communities. The refusal to provide personal data results in significant drawbacks for social interaction. That is why we believe that there is a need for tools to control one's own data in an easy and effective way as protection against economic interest of global companies and their cloud computing systems (as data collector from apps, mobiles and services). Especially, as nowadays everybody is permanently online using different services and devices, users are often lacking the means to effectively control the access to their private data. Therefore, we present an approach to manage and distribute privacy settings: PRIVACY-AVARE is intended to enable users to centrally determine their data protection preferences and to apply them on different devices. Thus, users gain control over their data when using cloud based services. In this paper, we present the main idea of PRIVACY-AVARE.
Nachhaltigkeit ist für die Gesellschaften unseres Planeten von grundlegender Bedeutung, ebenso wie Software Systeme immer mehr Teil der heutigen Gesellschaften werden. Daher gewinnt Nachhaltigkeit auch immer mehr an Relevanz im Software Engineering und es wurden erste Ansätze entwickelt, um Nachhaltigkeit bei dem Software System Design zu berücksichtigen. Dennoch bleibt es schwer die erst später eintreffenden Auswirkungen von Entscheidungen, die beim System Design getroffen werden, zu erkennen und zu bewerten. Um diese schwierige Aufgabe zu unterstützen, wird in der Keynote die Metapher „Sustainability Debt“ vorgestellt. Die Metapher hilft bei der Identifikation, Dokumentation und Kommunikation von Nachhaltigkeitsfragen im Software Engineering. Sie baut auf der bestehenden Metapher des „Technical Debt“ auf und erweitert diese um vier weitere Dimensionen der Nachhaltigkeit (individuell, sozial, ökologisch, ökonomisch). Neben der Bedeutung der Metapher Sustainability Debt und ihrer Verwendung im Software Engineering wird im Rahmen der Keynote auch darauf eingegangen wie im Software Engineering Entscheidungen getroffen werden. Da Entscheidungen im Rahmen des Sustainability Debts immer bedeuten einen Kompromiss zu schließen zwischen zeitnahen und entfernten Ergebnissen. Bei solchen intertemporalen Entscheidungen werden entfernte Ergebnisse oft als weniger bedeutsam bewertet als zeitnahe, was berücksichtigt werden muss, um eine entsprechende Entscheidungsunterstützung zur Verringerung des Sustainability Debts zu liefern.
Year after year, software engineers celebrate new achievements in the field of AI. At the same time, the question about the impacts of AI on society remains insufficiently answered in terms of a comprehensive technology assessment. This article aims to provide software practitioners with a theoretically grounded and practically tested approach that enables an initial understanding of the potential multidimensional impacts. Subsequently, the results form the basis for discussions on AI software requirements. The approach is based on the Sustainability Awareness Framework (SusAF) and Participatory Design. We conducted three workshops on different AI topics: 1. Autonomous Driving, 2. Music Composition, and 3. Memory Avatars. Based on the results of the workshops we conclude that a two-level approach should be adopted: First, a broad one that includes a diverse selection of stakeholders and overall impact analysis. Then, in a second step, specific approaches narrowing down the stakeholders and focusing on one or few impact areas.
Context: The Software Engineering process can be seen as a socio-technical activity that involves fulfilling one's role as part of a team. Accordingly, software products and services are the result of a specific collaboration between employees (and other stakeholders). In recent years, sustainability, which Requirements Engineers often paraphrase as the ability of a system to endure, is becoming part of the process and thus the responsibility of Software Engineers (SE) as well. Objectives: This study shines the spotlight on the role of the SE: their self-attribution and their awareness for sustainability. We interviewed 13 SEs to figure out how they perceive their own role and to which extent they implement the topic of sustainability in their daily work. By visualizing these two sides, it is possible to debate changes and their possible paths to benefit the Software Engineering process including sustainability design. Results: A discrepancy between the current role and the ideal role of SEs becomes visible. It is characterized in particular by dwelling on their “classic” or time-honored tasks as an executive force, such as coding. At the same time, they point out the still missing necessity of an interdisciplinary, from communication coined working method. According to our interviewees SEs are inefficiently involved in the design process. They do not sufficiently assume their responsibility for the software and its sustainability impacts.
Digital transformation is now reaching into topics like End-of-life Care, Funeral Culture, and Coping with Grief. Those developments are inevitably accompanied by the growing challenge to design IT systems that are appropriate and helpful for the stakeholders involved. Our aim in this paper is to further introduce the rather new combined research field of Socioinformatics and Thanatology (the scientific study of death and dying) and to present it with the first results on which requirements to consider for the design of digital tools within ‘Thanatopractice’. By using Participatory Design and the Sustainability Awareness Framework (SusAF) in the context of three workshops on socio-technical systems (Online Pastoral Care, Virtual Graveyards, and AI Memory Avatars), we want to sensitize software practitioners to the multidimensional impacts of their products and services in a field, which the participants in the workshops often described as “highly sensitive”.